↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of subgroups of breast cancer patients on pain and co-occurring symptoms following chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of subgroups of breast cancer patients on pain and co-occurring symptoms following chemotherapy
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00520-015-2819-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dale J. Langford, Steven M. Paul, Bruce Cooper, Kord M. Kober, Judy Mastick, Michelle Melisko, Jon D. Levine, Fay Wright, Marilyn J. Hammer, Frances Cartwright, Kathryn A. Lee, Bradley E. Aouizerat, Christine Miaskowski

Abstract

The purposes of this study, in a sample of women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy (CTX), were to identify subgroups of women with distinct experiences with the symptom cluster of pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms and evaluate differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, differences in psychological symptoms, and differences in pain characteristics among these subgroups. Patients completed symptom questionnaires in the week following CTX administration. Latent class profile analysis (LCPA) was used to determine the patient subgroups. Three subgroups were identified: 140 patients (35.8 %) in the "low," 189 patients (48.3 %) in the "moderate," and 62 patients (15.9 %) in the "all high" latent class. Patients in the all high class had a lower functional status, a higher comorbidity profile, a higher symptom burden, and a poorer quality of life. Study findings provide evidence of the utility of LCPA to explain inter-individual variability in the symptom experience of patients undergoing CTX. The ability to characterize subgroups of patients with distinct symptom experiences allows for the identification of high-risk patients and may guide the design of targeted interventions that are tailored to an individual's symptom profile.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Psychology 7 8%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,282,766
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#4,004
of 4,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,183
of 262,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#70
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.