↓ Skip to main content

Recurrent TIPS failure associated with biliary fistulae: Treatment with PTFE-covered stents

Overview of attention for article published in CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, July 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Recurrent TIPS failure associated with biliary fistulae: Treatment with PTFE-covered stents
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, July 1999
DOI 10.1007/s002709900392
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Y. Sze, Thomas Vestring, Robert P. Liddell, Noriyuki Kato, Charles P. Semba, Mahmood K. Razavi, Stephen T. Kee, Michael D. Dake

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2011.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#660
of 2,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,949
of 35,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.