↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of various anticoccidials against experimental porcine neonatal isosporosis

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of various anticoccidials against experimental porcine neonatal isosporosis
Published in
Parasitology Research, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00436-006-0314-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. C. Mundt, S. Mundt-Wüstenberg, A. Daugschies, A. Joachim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 6%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2011.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#627
of 3,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,574
of 67,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,802 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.