↓ Skip to main content

Remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals with an emphasis on immobilization technology

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Geochemistry and Health, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
Title
Remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals with an emphasis on immobilization technology
Published in
Environmental Geochemistry and Health, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10653-017-9964-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zahra Derakhshan Nejad, Myung Chae Jung, Ki-Hyun Kim

Abstract

The major frequent contaminants in soil are heavy metals which may be responsible for detrimental health effects. The remediation of heavy metals in contaminated soils is considered as one of the most complicated tasks. Among different technologies, in situ immobilization of metals has received a great deal of attention and turned out to be a promising solution for soil remediation. In this review, remediation methods for removal of heavy metals in soil are explored with an emphasis on the in situ immobilization technique of metal(loid)s. Besides, the immobilization technique in contaminated soils is evaluated through the manipulation of the bioavailability of heavy metals using a range of soil amendment conditions. This technique is expected to efficiently alleviate the risk of groundwater contamination, plant uptake, and exposure to other living organisms. The efficacy of several amendments (e.g., red mud, biochar, phosphate rock) has been examined to emphasize the need for the simultaneous measurement of leaching and the phytoavailability of heavy metals. In addition, some amendments that are used in this technique are inexpensive and readily available in large quantities because they have been derived from bio-products or industrial by-products (e.g., biochar, red mud, and steel slag). Among different amendments, iron-rich compounds and biochars show high efficiency to remediate multi-metal contaminated soils. Thereupon, immobilization technique can be considered a preferable option as it is inexpensive and easily applicable to large quantities of contaminants derived from various sources.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 336 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Researcher 30 9%
Student > Master 30 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 139 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 54 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 15%
Engineering 24 7%
Chemistry 13 4%
Chemical Engineering 9 3%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 151 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geochemistry and Health
#205
of 856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,944
of 312,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geochemistry and Health
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 856 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.