| Title |
Visual diagnosis of Taenia saginata cysticercosis during meat inspection: is it unequivocal?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasitology Research, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00436-006-0158-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Abuseir, C. Epe, T. Schnieder, G. Klein, M. Kühne |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 32% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 14 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2006.
All research outputs
#7,463,181
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#621
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,462
of 66,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.