↓ Skip to main content

FDG-PET/CT findings in systemic mastocytosis: a French multicentre study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
FDG-PET/CT findings in systemic mastocytosis: a French multicentre study
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00259-015-3117-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Djelbani-Ahmed, M. O. Chandesris, A. Mekinian, D. Canioni, C. Brouzes, K. Hanssens, G. Pop, I. Durieu, S. Durupt, B. Grosbois, S. Besnard, O. Tournilhac, O. Beyne-Rauzy, P. Agapé, A. Delmer, D. Ranta, P. Y. Jeandel, S. Georgin-Lavialle, L. Frenzel, G. Damaj, V. Eder, O. Lortholary, O. Hermine, O. Fain, M. Soussan

Abstract

Mastocytosis is a clonal haematological disease characterized by uncontrolled proliferation and the activation of mast cells. The value of FDG-PET/CT (FDG-PET) in mastocytosis has yet to be determined. We retrospectively identified patients with an established diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis (SM), according to the WHO criteria, who underwent PET using the French Reference Centre for Mastocytosis database. Semi-quantitative and visual analysis of FDG-PET was performed and compared to the clinico-biological data. Our cohort included 19 adult patients, median age 65 years [range 58-74], including three with smouldering SM (SSM), three with aggressive SM (ASM), 10 with an associated clonal haematological non-mast-cell lineage disease (SM-AHNMD), and three with mast cell sarcoma (MCS). FDG-PET was performed at the time of the SM diagnosis (15/19), to evaluate lymph node (LN) activity (3/19) or the efficacy of therapy (1/19). FDG uptake was observed in the bone marrow (BM) (9/19, 47 %), LN (6/19, 32 %), spleen (12/19, 63 %), or liver (1/19, 5 %). No significant FDG uptake was observed in the SSM and ASM patients. A pathological FDG uptake was observed in the BM of 6/10 patients with SM-AHNMD, appearing as diffuse and homogeneous, and in the LN of 5/10 patients. All 3 MCS patients showed intense and multifocal BM pathological uptake, mimicking metastasis. No correlation was found between the FDG-PET findings and serum tryptase levels, BM mast cell infiltration percentage, and CD30 and CD2 expression by mast cells. FDG uptake does not appear to be a sensitive marker of mast cell activation or proliferation because no significant FDG uptake was observed in most common forms of mastocytosis (notably purely aggressive SM). However, pathological FDG uptake was observed in the SM-AHNMD and in MCS cases, suggesting a role of FDG-PET in their early identification and as a tool of therapeutic assessment in this subgroup of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 21 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 22%
Other 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 61%
Chemistry 2 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,882,733
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#1,782
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,436
of 263,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#23
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.