Title |
Phylogenetic analysis of H7 haemagglutinin subtype influenza A viruses
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Virology, May 2000
|
DOI | 10.1007/s007050050695 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J. Banks, E. C. Speidel, J. W. McCauley, D. J. Alexander |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 19% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 52% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,702,239
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#378
of 4,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,966
of 39,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.