↓ Skip to main content

Accumulation of cadmium, lead, and nickel by fungal and wood biosorbents

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, May 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Accumulation of cadmium, lead, and nickel by fungal and wood biosorbents
Published in
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, May 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02788603
Authors

Z. R. Holan, B. Volesky

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Chemistry 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2011.
All research outputs
#7,698,055
of 23,416,487 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#555
of 2,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,597
of 25,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,416,487 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,561 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.