| Title |
Better verification through symmetry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Formal Methods in System Design, August 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00625968 |
| Authors |
C. Norris IP, David L. Dill |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 47% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 38 | 72% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Formal Methods in System Design
#6
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,359
of 29,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Formal Methods in System Design
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them