| Title |
Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10195-008-0105-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. Falez, F. Casella, G. Panegrossi, F. Favetti, C. Barresi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 64% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Design | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#60
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,197
of 81,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.