↓ Skip to main content

Waterborne polymers for use in thermoset coatings: A new hydrolysis resistant monomer as a replacement for acetoacetoxyethyl methacrylate

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Coatings Technology, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Waterborne polymers for use in thermoset coatings: A new hydrolysis resistant monomer as a replacement for acetoacetoxyethyl methacrylate
Published in
Journal of Coatings Technology, February 2002
DOI 10.1007/bf02720153
Authors

J. E. Blasko, G. C. Calhoun, R. J. Esser, R. E. Karabetsos, D. T. Krawczak, C. S. Giddings, D. L. Trumbo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Student > Master 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 43%
Unspecified 1 14%
Chemical Engineering 1 14%
Materials Science 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Coatings Technology
#8
of 75 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,340
of 132,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Coatings Technology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.