↓ Skip to main content

An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide Antagonists in vivo in the Anaesthetized Dog

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacology, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide Antagonists in vivo in the Anaesthetized Dog
Published in
Pharmacology, October 2002
DOI 10.1159/000065535
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Markos, B.A. Hennessy, M. Fitzpatrick, J. O’Sullivan, H.M. Snow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Sports and Recreations 1 20%
Neuroscience 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2011.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacology
#185
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,366
of 48,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them