↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of In Situ and Laboratory Toxicity Tests with the Estuarine Amphipod Eohaustorius estuarius

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
A Comparison of In Situ and Laboratory Toxicity Tests with the Estuarine Amphipod Eohaustorius estuarius
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00244-003-2243-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. S. Anderson, J. W. Hunt, B. M. Phillips, P. A. Nicely, R. S. Tjeerdema, M. Martin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 33%
Unspecified 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2011.
All research outputs
#7,850,857
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#567
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,471
of 136,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.