↓ Skip to main content

Vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of large skin defects due to necrotizing fasciitis

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of large skin defects due to necrotizing fasciitis
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00134-004-2553-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hilde R. H. de Geus, Johan M. van der Klooster

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Other 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 57%
Computer Science 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,878
of 5,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,904
of 142,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.