| Title |
Mechanisms of GABAA receptor assembly and trafficking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Neurobiology, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1385/mn:26:2-3:251 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josef T. Kittler, Kristina McAinsh, Stephen J. Moss |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 26% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#1,608
of 3,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,444
of 130,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.