↓ Skip to main content

Have CT and MR Angiography Replaced Catheter Angiography in Diagnosing Peripheral Arterial Disease?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Radiology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Have CT and MR Angiography Replaced Catheter Angiography in Diagnosing Peripheral Arterial Disease?
Published in
Journal of the American College of Radiology, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.04.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manisha C. Patel, David C. Levin, Laurence Parker, Vijay M. Rao

Abstract

To determine whether MR angiography (MRA) and CT angiography (CTA) have replaced diagnostic catheter angiography (DCA) in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. Medicare Part B databases for 2002-2013 were reviewed. Current Procedural Terminology codes for extremity MRA, CTA, and DCA were selected. Physician specialty codes were used to classify providers as radiologists, cardiologists, or surgeons. Utilization rates per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries were calculated. Among all specialties, the combined utilization rate of all 3 types of angiography increased from 917 per 100,000 in 2002 to 1,261 in 2006 (+38%), after which it remained stable until 2010, and then declined to 1,010 in 2013. The overall rate of MRA and CTA together increased from 89 in 2002 to 440 in 2006 (+394%), after which it leveled off, and then gradually decreased to 331 in 2013. In 2013, 33% of the total procedures were MRA or CTA, up from 10% in 2002. Radiologists performed >85% of MRA and CTA examinations. Among radiologists, the DCA utilization rate decreased by 75% from 2002 to 2013, whereas among cardiologists and surgeons together, the overall DCA utilization rate increased by 64% from 2002 to 2010 before dropping somewhat in 2011. Among radiologists, MRA and CTA have replaced DCA in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. Although overall utilization of DCA has remained steady, it has risen sharply among cardiologists and surgeons, while dropping sharply among radiologists. Given the increased utilization of DCA among cardiologists and surgeons despite noninvasive alternatives, self-referral continues to be of concern in the setting of increasing health care costs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Other 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2015.
All research outputs
#16,106,935
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#2,470
of 3,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,748
of 276,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#57
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.