↓ Skip to main content

A shifting landseape: What will be next FDG in PET oncology?

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Nuclear Medicine, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
A shifting landseape: What will be next FDG in PET oncology?
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine, February 2002
DOI 10.1007/bf02995285
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomio Inoue, Noboru Oriuchi, Katsumi Tomiyoshi, Keigo Endo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Professor 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2011.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#115
of 636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,250
of 124,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them