You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Utility of CD54, CD229, and CD319 for the identification of plasma cells in patients with clonal plasma cell diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cyto.b.21269 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fanny Pojero, Juan Flores‐Montero, Luzalba Sanoja, José Juan Pérez, Noemí Puig, Bruno Paiva, Sebastian Bottcher, Jacques J. M. van Dongen, Alberto Orfao, on behalf of the EuroFlow group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Researcher | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2015.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry
#462
of 605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,842
of 278,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.