| Title |
Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hernia, September 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s100290100019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Junge, U. Klinge, A. Prescher, P. Giboni, M. Niewiera, V. Schumpelick |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 21% |
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 29% |
| Engineering | 32 | 29% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,388,612
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#110
of 1,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,694
of 39,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them