| Title |
Pyridostigmine in autonomic failure: can we treat postural hypotension and bladder dysfunction with one drug?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Autonomic Research, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10286-006-0358-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tatsuya Yamamoto, Ryuji Sakakibara, Yoshitaka Yamanaka, Tomoyuki Uchiyama, Masato Asahina, Zhi Liu, Takashi Ito, Yu Koyama, Yusuke Awa, Kaori Yamamoto, Mika Kinou, Takamichi Hattori |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Autonomic Research
#303
of 788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,711
of 64,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Autonomic Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them