↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between physical impairments, quality of life and disability of the neck and upper limb in patients following neck dissection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
The relationship between physical impairments, quality of life and disability of the neck and upper limb in patients following neck dissection
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11764-018-0697-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elise M. Gane, Steven M. McPhail, Anna L. Hatton, Benedict J. Panizza, Shaun P. O’Leary

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between physical impairments, quality of life and disability in patients following neck dissection, with consideration of patient and clinical characteristics. Cross-sectional study of patients < 5 years after neck dissection for head and neck cancer. Quality of life and self-reported disability were measured with the Neck Dissection Impairment Index, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and Neck Disability Index. Active neck and shoulder range of motion and isometric muscle strength were also assessed. Generalised linear modelling was used to explore relationships between variables. Eighty-four participants (68% male, median age 61 years) demonstrated reduced quality of life (median (interquartile range) score = 76 (49, 93) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)), and mild levels of upper limb (14 (2, 32)) and neck disability (14 (6, 28)) (from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)). Bilateral neck dissection was associated with reduced quality of life (coeff (95% CI) = - 12.49 (- 24.69, - 0.29)). Post-operative chemoradiation therapy was associated with reduced quality of life (- 21.46 (- 37.57, - 5.35)) and neck disability (0.71 (0.10, 1.32)). Measures of shoulder flexibility or strength were associated with quality of life and self-reported disability. Quality of life and musculoskeletal disability after neck dissection are associated with factors from multiple domains including physical motor function and treatment modality. Having reduced shoulder flexibility or strength is related to functional deficits and quality of life after neck dissection for head and neck cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Unspecified 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 30 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Unspecified 7 8%
Computer Science 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 33 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,522,480
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#770
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,631
of 327,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.