You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Plants, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nplants.2015.80 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip A. Fay, Suzanne M. Prober, W. Stanley Harpole, Johannes M. H. Knops, Jonathan D. Bakker, Elizabeth T. Borer, Eric M. Lind, Andrew S. MacDougall, Eric W. Seabloom, Peter D. Wragg, Peter B. Adler, Dana M. Blumenthal, Yvonne M. Buckley, Chengjin Chu, Elsa E. Cleland, Scott L. Collins, Kendi F. Davies, Guozhen Du, Xiaohui Feng, Jennifer Firn, Daniel S. Gruner, Nicole Hagenah, Yann Hautier, Robert W. Heckman, Virginia L. Jin, Kevin P. Kirkman, Julia Klein, Laura M. Ladwig, Qi Li, Rebecca L. McCulley, Brett A. Melbourne, Charles E. Mitchell, Joslin L. Moore, John W. Morgan, Anita C. Risch, Martin Schütz, Carly J. Stevens, David A. Wedin, Louie H. Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Germany | 3 | 7% |
| Argentina | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 57% |
| Scientists | 14 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Argentina | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 435 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 22% |
| Researcher | 80 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 14% |
| Unknown | 95 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 185 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 101 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 4% |
| Unknown | 116 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,670,073
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#856
of 2,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,227
of 279,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#10
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.