↓ Skip to main content

Circulating Cell-Free Tumour DNA in the Management of Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circulating Cell-Free Tumour DNA in the Management of Cancer
Published in
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, June 2015
DOI 10.3390/ijms160614122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glenn Francis, Sandra Stein

Abstract

With the development of new sensitive molecular techniques, circulating cell-free tumour DNA containing mutations can be identified in the plasma of cancer patients. The applications of this technology may result in significant changes to the care and management of cancer patients. Whilst, currently, these "liquid biopsies" are used to supplement the histological diagnosis of cancer and metastatic disease, in the future these assays may replace the need for invasive procedures. Applications include the monitoring of tumour burden, the monitoring of minimal residual disease, monitoring of tumour heterogeneity, monitoring of molecular resistance and early diagnosis of tumours and metastatic disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 241 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 14%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Other 26 11%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 37 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 41 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,418,105
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Molecular Sciences
#2,440
of 44,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,772
of 278,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Molecular Sciences
#15
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.