↓ Skip to main content

Comparative studies of piscine and amphibian iridoviruses

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Comparative studies of piscine and amphibian iridoviruses
Published in
Archives of Virology, February 2000
DOI 10.1007/s007050050025
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. D. Hyatt, A. R. Gould, Z. Zupanovic, A. A. Cunningham, S. Hengstberger, R. J. Whittington, J. Kattenbelt, B. E. H. Coupar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 4%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 74 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 54%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 10%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,463,181
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#918
of 4,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,898
of 108,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.