↓ Skip to main content

mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): A Valid Component of a National Assessment Programme in the UK?

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): A Valid Component of a National Assessment Programme in the UK?
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10459-006-9033-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian Archer, John Norcini, Lesley Southgate, Shelley Heard, Helena Davies

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 102 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 35 32%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 47%
Social Sciences 13 12%
Psychology 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 17 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2015.
All research outputs
#14,690,833
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#632
of 851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,694
of 66,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.