↓ Skip to main content

MWCNT/activated-carbon freestanding sheets: a different approach to fabricate flexible electrodes for supercapacitors

Overview of attention for article published in Ionics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
MWCNT/activated-carbon freestanding sheets: a different approach to fabricate flexible electrodes for supercapacitors
Published in
Ionics, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11581-018-2585-4
Authors

Rahmat Agung Susantyoko, Fathima Parveen, Ibrahim Mustafa, Saif Almheiri

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Master 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 2 12%
Chemistry 2 12%
Engineering 2 12%
Materials Science 1 6%
Energy 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Ionics
#69
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,813
of 327,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ionics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.