Title |
Chironomids: suitable test organisms for risk assessment investigations on the potential endocrine disrupting properties of pesticides
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecotoxicology, February 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10646-006-0117-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Verena Taenzler, Eric Bruns, Michael Dorgerloh, Verena Pfeifle, Lennart Weltje |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Finland | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Poland | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 76 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 28 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 28% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2009.
All research outputs
#4,702,669
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#146
of 1,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,235
of 160,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,475 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.