↓ Skip to main content

Expanded ceramic foam

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, February 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Expanded ceramic foam
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, February 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00367869
Authors

E. J. A. E. Williams, J. R. G. Evans

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 5%
Sweden 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 26%
Materials Science 4 21%
Engineering 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2011.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#941
of 4,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,057
of 79,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.