↓ Skip to main content

Rationale of subdermal superficial liposuction related to the anatomy of subcutaneous fat and the superficial fascial system

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Rationale of subdermal superficial liposuction related to the anatomy of subcutaneous fat and the superficial fascial system
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, January 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00209305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Gasperoni, Marzia Salgarello

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#288
of 1,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,276
of 76,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,234 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.