↓ Skip to main content

Simulation of Power Gain and Dissipation in Field-Coupled Nanomagnets

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Electronics, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 119)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Simulation of Power Gain and Dissipation in Field-Coupled Nanomagnets
Published in
Journal of Computational Electronics, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10825-005-7118-5
Authors

G. Csaba, P. Lugli, A. Csurgay, W. Porod

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Researcher 5 13%
Professor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 34%
Physics and Astronomy 11 29%
Materials Science 7 18%
Chemistry 3 8%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Electronics
#27
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,086
of 60,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Electronics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them