| Title |
Effects of pH on the dispersion and cell performance of LiCoO2 cathodes based on the aqueous process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-006-1172-7 |
| Authors |
Chia-Chen Li, Jyh-Tsung Lee, Yi-Ling Tung, Chang-Rung Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 34% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 13 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 17% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#941
of 4,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,315
of 74,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#15
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.