| Title |
Improving representativeness of genebank collections through species distribution models, gap analysis and ecogeographical maps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-011-0167-0 |
| Authors |
M. Parra-Quijano, J. M. Iriondo, E. Torres |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 100 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 67% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,383,408
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#344
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,986
of 153,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.