↓ Skip to main content

Three novel spermatogenesis‐specific zinc finger genes

Overview of attention for article published in Febs Letters, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three novel spermatogenesis‐specific zinc finger genes
Published in
Febs Letters, June 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00669-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helge Weissig, Sonoko Narisawa, Carin Sikström, Per G Olsson, John R McCarrey, Panagiotis A. Tsonis, Katia Del Rio-Tsonis, José Luis Millán

Abstract

We have cloned and characterized the expression, during spermatogenesis, of three novel zinc finger genes (Zfp94, Zfp95, Zfp96). Analysis of the deduced protein sequences reveals that all three molecules belong to the LeR family (leucine-rich zinc fingers) and that ZFP95 contains a domain homologous to the Krüppel-associated box. All three genes were found expressed at high levels in testis among other tissues, but testis-specific transcripts were observed for Zfp95 and Zfp96. Northern blot analyses of the testis-specific transcripts of Zfp95 and Zfp96 were performed using whole testis RNA as well as RNA isolated from enriched populations of specific spermatogenic cell types. The testis-specific transcript of Zfp95 showed the highest expression in pachytene spermatocytes, while that of Zfp96 was highly expressed in pachytene spermatocytes, in round spermatids and residual bodies. Northern blot analysis of RNA from the testis of mice carrying the atrichosis mutation further validated these expression patterns. In particular, the testis-specific transcripts of Zfp95 and Zfp96 were greatly reduced in heterozygous, and completely absent in homozygous testis RNA from atrichosis mutant mice, further defining the germ cell specificity of these transcripts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 18%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 9%
Canada 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 55%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Febs Letters
#4,917
of 14,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,523
of 52,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Febs Letters
#37
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,373 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.