↓ Skip to main content

RT-PCR amplification of CK19 mRNA in the blood of breast cancer patients: correlation with established prognostic parameters

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
RT-PCR amplification of CK19 mRNA in the blood of breast cancer patients: correlation with established prognostic parameters
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, March 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1006350913243
Authors

Harriette J. Kahn, Lu-Ying Yang, John Blondal, Lavina Lickley, Claire Holloway, Wedad Hanna, Steven Narod, David R. McCready, Arun Seth, Alexander Marks, Alexander Marks

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 8%
China 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,684
of 4,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,887
of 40,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.