↓ Skip to main content

Nail Swelling as a Pre-formulation Screen for the Selection and Optimisation of Ungual Penetration Enhancers

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Nail Swelling as a Pre-formulation Screen for the Selection and Optimisation of Ungual Penetration Enhancers
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11095-007-9368-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. H. Khengar, S. A. Jones, R. B. Turner, B. Forbes, M. B. Brown

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Chemistry 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,023
of 2,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,428
of 67,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#11
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.