| Title |
The geochemistry of iodine — a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Geochemistry and Health, June 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02311063 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronald Fuge, Christopher C. Johnson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 24% |
| Researcher | 26 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 33 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2005.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geochemistry and Health
#205
of 856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,098
of 11,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geochemistry and Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 856 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them