↓ Skip to main content

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is not benign: a long-term outcome study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is not benign: a long-term outcome study
Published in
Journal of Neurology, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00415-011-6273-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanne M. Yri, Marianne Wegener, Birgit Sander, Rigmor Jensen

Abstract

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) primarily affects young obese females, and potentially causes visual loss and severe headache. The aim of this experiment is to examine relapse rate and long-term outcome in IIH patients. The methods involved in this experiment include a prospective controlled study of 18 newly diagnosed IIH patients followed for a mean observation period of 21.1 (±8.0) months. Treatment regime included diuretics, dietary recommendations and check-up visits at a dietician. Baseline and follow-up included neurological examination, detailed headache history and comprehensive neuro-ophthalmological examination, including fundus photography, Humphrey visual fields, and measurement of the retinal thickness (RT) and retinal nerve fiber layers (RNFL) by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Relapse was defined as recurrence of either: (1) papilledema or (2) symptoms and demonstrated raised ICP. The result of this experiment is that relapse was found in 28%. Visual function improved from baseline to follow-up and was generally favorable. In patients without relapse of papilledema RT and RNFL were significantly thinner than in healthy controls (p = 0.003 and 0.02), although atrophy was clinically detectable in only one patient. Headache was still present in 67% of the patients at follow-up. Headache was heterogenic and unrelated to relapse. After an initial reduction, weight increased again in the relapse group compared to reduced weight in the non-relapse group (p = 0.013). Thus, the conclusions drawn are that headache was persistent, difficult to classify, and equally represented in relapse and non-relapse patients. Headache was thus a poor marker of active disease. Relapse rate was high and clinically undetectable optic disc atrophy was discovered in apparently well treated IIH patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 12 17%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 54%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,298,749
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,612
of 4,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,868
of 139,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#29
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.