| Title |
A fracture mechanics analysis of indentation-induced Palmqvist crack in ceramics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science Letters, May 1983
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00725625 |
| Authors |
K. Niihara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 240 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 26% |
| Researcher | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 95 | 38% |
| Engineering | 69 | 28% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 64 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,769,456
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#19
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#911
of 8,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them