↓ Skip to main content

Role of Primary Constitutive Phosphorylation of Sendai Virus P and V Proteins in Viral Replication and Pathogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Virology, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of Primary Constitutive Phosphorylation of Sendai Virus P and V Proteins in Viral Replication and Pathogenesis
Published in
Virology, October 1999
DOI 10.1006/viro.1999.9953
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng-jun Hu, Atsushi Kato, Mary C. Bowman, Katsuhiro Kiyotani, Tetsuya Yoshida, Sue A. Moyer, Yoshiyuki Nagai, Kailash C. Gupta

Abstract

Functional analysis of the primary constitutive phosphorylation of Sendai virus P and V proteins was performed using both in vitro and in vivo systems. Sendai virus minigenome transcription and replication in transfected cells were not significantly affected in the presence of primary phosphorylation deficient P protein (S249A, S249D, P250A) as measured by either the luciferase activity or the Northern blot analysis. Similarly, recombinant Sendai viruses lacking the primary phosphorylation in P grew to titers close to the wild-type virus in cell cultures and in the natural host of Sendai virus, the mouse. Mutant viruses showed no altered pathogenesis in mice lungs. Oligomerization of P by binding WT P or mutant P to GST-P (WT) Sepharose beads revealed that the primary phosphorylation was not crucial for P protein oligomerization. Similar to P protein primary phosphorylation, the V protein primary phosphorylation at serine249 was not essential for minigenome transcription and replication, as both WT and mutant V proteins were found equally inhibitory to the minigenome replication. These results show that the primary phosphorylation of P protein has no essential role in Sendai virus transcription, replication, and pathogenesis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 12%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Researcher 5 29%
Professor 3 18%
Student > Master 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Virology
#3,591
of 9,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,571
of 35,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology
#22
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.