| Title |
Influence of a niosomal formulation on the oral bioavailability of acyclovir in rabbits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AAPS PharmSciTech, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1208/pt0804106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ismail A. Attia, Sanaa A. El-Gizawy, Medhat A. Fouda, Ahmed M. Donia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#502
of 1,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,449
of 166,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.