Title |
Retrograde regulation of nuclear gene expression in CW-CMS of rice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Molecular Biology, November 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11103-006-9097-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sota Fujii, Setsuko Komatsu, Kinya Toriyama |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
Researcher | 8 | 21% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 67% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,323,760
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#133
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,554
of 70,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.