| Title |
Analysis of fiducial markers used for on-line verification in the external-beam radiotherapy of patients with cranial tumours
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Oncology, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12094-007-0097-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. M. Cañón, I. Azinovic, M. Lobato, J. Navarro, J. Rebollo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 33% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#356
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,088
of 70,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them