↓ Skip to main content

Proportionate progress: A notion of fairness in resource allocation

Overview of attention for article published in Algorithmica, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
489 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Proportionate progress: A notion of fairness in resource allocation
Published in
Algorithmica, June 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01940883
Authors

S. K. Baruah, N. K. Cohen, C. G. Plaxton, D. A. Varvel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 32%
Student > Master 10 23%
Professor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 34 77%
Engineering 5 11%
Mathematics 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Algorithmica
#78
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,370
of 27,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Algorithmica
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.