↓ Skip to main content

List of posters 2005

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
List of posters 2005
Published in
NeuroImage, January 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.022
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 21%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Computer Science 8 8%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#6,651
of 12,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,859
of 151,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#28
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.