↓ Skip to main content

Uncertainties in WIMP dark matter scattering revisited

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal C, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Uncertainties in WIMP dark matter scattering revisited
Published in
The European Physical Journal C, July 2018
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6047-y
Authors

John Ellis, Natsumi Nagata, Keith A. Olive

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 70%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,528,733
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal C
#2,764
of 9,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,607
of 343,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal C
#63
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.