↓ Skip to main content

An on-chip whole blood/plasma separator with bead-packed microchannel on COC polymer

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Microdevices, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
An on-chip whole blood/plasma separator with bead-packed microchannel on COC polymer
Published in
Biomedical Microdevices, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10544-010-9449-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joon S. Shim, Andrew W. Browne, Chong H. Ahn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 33%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 44 49%
Chemistry 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#237
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,822
of 94,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.