↓ Skip to main content

Exploiting the intrinsic microbial degradative potential for field-based in situ dechlorination of trichloroethene contaminated groundwater

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hazardous Materials, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploiting the intrinsic microbial degradative potential for field-based in situ dechlorination of trichloroethene contaminated groundwater
Published in
Journal of Hazardous Materials, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric M. Adetutu, Taylor D. Gundry, Sayali S. Patil, Aida Golneshin, Joy Adigun, Vijay Bhaskarla, Samuel Aleer, Esmaeil Shahsavari, Elizabeth Ross, Andrew S. Ball

Abstract

Bioremediation of trichloroethene (TCE) polluted groundwater is challenging, with limited next generation sequencing (NGS) derived information available on microbial community dynamics associated with dechlorination. Understanding these dynamics is important for designing and improving TCE bioremediation. In this study, biostimulation (BS), biostimulation-bioaugmentation (BS-BA) and monitored natural attenuation (MNA) approaches were applied to contaminated groundwater wells resulted in ≥95% dechlorination within 7 months. Vinyl chloride's final concentrations in stimulated wells were between 1.84 and 1.87μgL(-1), below the US EPA limit of 2.0μgL(-1), compared to MNA (4.3μgL(-1)). Assessment of the groundwater microbial community with qPCR showed up to ∼50-fold increase in the classical dechlorinators' (Geobacter and Dehalococcoides sp.) population post-treatment. Metagenomic assays revealed shifts from Gammaproteobacteria (pre-treatment) to Epsilonproteobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria (post-treatment) only in stimulated wells. Although stimulated wells were functionally distinct from MNA wells post-treatment, substantial dechlorination in all the wells implied some measure of redundancy. This study, one of the few NGS-based field studies on TCE bioremediation, provides greater insights into dechlorinating microbial community dynamics which should be useful for future field-based studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 22 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Engineering 6 7%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 26 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#4,184
of 7,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,540
of 278,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#28
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.