| Title |
Real-Time Remote Telefluoroscopic Assessment of Patients with Dysphagia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, April 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00455-001-0116-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrienne L. Perlman, Weerasak Witthawaskul |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2012.
All research outputs
#5,700,702
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#359
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,994
of 123,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.