↓ Skip to main content

Cost Effectiveness of Secukinumab for the Treatment of Active Psoriatic Arthritis in the UK

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Cost Effectiveness of Secukinumab for the Treatment of Active Psoriatic Arthritis in the UK
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40273-018-0674-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Buchanan, Will Sullivan, Chris Graham, LaStella Miles, Steffen Marc Jugl, Praveen Gunda, Anna Halliday, Bruce Kirkham

Abstract

The aim was to determine the cost effectiveness of secukinumab, a fully human interleukin-17A inhibitor, for adults in the UK with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who are tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) naïve and without concomitant moderate-to-severe psoriasis, and who have responded inadequately to conventional systemic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). The study took the perspective and setting of the UK National Health Service (NHS). The model structure was a 3-month decision tree leading into a Markov model. Separate analyses based on the number of prior csDMARDs (one and  two or more) were conducted, with secukinumab 150 mg compared to standard of care (SoC) and TNFis, respectively, for each subpopulation. Clinical parameters, including response at 3 months, were from the FUTURE 2 trial and a network meta-analysis. Outcomes included total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over the 40-year time horizon (3.5% annual discount for both outcomes; cost year 2017), and incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The ICER for secukinumab 150 mg versus SoC was £28,748 per QALY gained (one prior csDMARD). Secukinumab 150 mg dominated golimumab, certolizumab pegol and etanercept, and had an ICER of £5680 per QALY gained versus adalimumab and > £1 million saved per QALY foregone versus infliximab (two or more prior csDMARDs). Valuing one QALY at between £20,000 and £30,000, the probability of secukinumab having the highest net monetary benefit was 48.9% (one prior csDMARD) and 88.9% (two or more prior csDMARDs). Parameters related to Health Assessment Questionnaire scores were most influential. Secukinumab 150 mg at list price appears to represent a cost-effective use of NHS resources for adults with PsA who have responded inadequately to one or two or more prior csDMARDs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 30 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,886,345
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#791
of 1,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,083
of 330,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#15
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.