Title |
Stabilization of cortical microtubules by the cell wall in cultured tobacco cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Planta, October 1990
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02411386 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tomohiro Akashi, Shinji Kawasaki, Hiroh Shibaoka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 50% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Other | 1 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 67% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2013.
All research outputs
#4,769,456
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#210
of 2,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,808
of 16,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,740 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.